DrinkMiracles.com
__________________________
BACK
Antimicrobial interventions to reduce Salmonella species on poultry.
Comparison of electrolyzed oxidizing water with various antimicrobial
interventions to reduce Salmonella species on poultry.
Poult Sci. 2002 Oct;81(10):1598-605.
Fabrizio KA, Sharma RR, Demirci A, Cutter CN.
Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
16802, USA.
Foodborne pathogens in cell suspensions or attached to surfaces can be
reduced by electrolyzed oxidizing (EO) water; however, the use of EO water
against pathogens associated with poultry has not been explored. In this study,
acidic EO water [EO-A; pH 2.6, chlorine (CL) 20 to 50 ppm, and
oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of 1,150 mV], basic EO water (EO-B; pH 11.6,
ORP of -795 mV), CL, ozonated water (OZ), acetic acid (AA), or trisodium
phosphate (TSP) was applied to broiler carcasses inoculated with Salmonella
Typhimurium (ST) and submerged (4 C, 45 min), spray-washed (85 psi, 25 C, 15 s),
or subjected to multiple interventions (EO-B spray, immersed in EO-A; AA or TSP
spray, immersed in CL).
Remaining bacterial populations were determined and compared at Day 0 and 7
of aerobic, refrigerated storage. At Day 0, submersion in TSP and AA reduced ST
1.41 log10, whereas EO-A water reduced ST approximately 0.86 log10. After 7 d of
storage, EO-A water, OZ, TSP, and AA reduced ST, with detection only after
selective enrichment. Spray-washing treatments with any of the compounds did not
reduce ST at Day 0. After 7 d of storage, TSP, AA, and EO-A water reduced ST
2.17, 2.31, and 1.06 log10, respectively. ST was reduced 2.11 log10 immediately
following the multiple interventions, 3.81 log10 after 7 d of storage. Although
effective against ST, TSP and AA are costly and adversely affect the
environment. This study demonstrates that EO water can reduce ST on poultry
surfaces following extended refrigerated storage.
Copyright © 2007-2009 DrinkMiracles.com
Privacy Policy